中国国家主席习近平访问美国的亮点，是为他举行的国宴。当晚最引人注目的，不仅是在场的私人企业与商界巨头星光熠熠，更在于他们以及全世界的观众，所听到的远不只是这类场合一贯伴随的外交辞令。
出席的美国顶尖科技与金融界高管包括英伟达首席执行员黄仁勋、特斯拉首席执行员马斯克、OpenAI首席执行员萨姆·奥特曼、苹果公司前首席执行员库克、摩根大通首席执行员杰米·戴蒙、贝莱德首席执行员拉里·芬克、花旗集团首席执行员简·弗雷泽、高盛首席执行员大卫·所罗门，以及苏斯克汉纳国际集团（Susquehanna International Group）首席执行员杰夫·亚斯（TikTok知名投资者）。
他们听到了两篇不寻常的演讲，为美中双边关系以及正在形成中的新世界秩序，提供了正面的讯号。
重申具有重大意义且稳定的关系
特朗普总统在欢迎致词中赞扬美国与中国的关系，并表示他与习近平主席“从未相处得这么好”。这篇演讲对美中关系也展现出格外温和的语调。他从两国深厚的历史传承切入，将中国数千年的传统，从孙武到孙中山与美国源自耶路撒冷、罗马、雅典、斯巴达，以及250年前在费城起草的美国独立宣言的自由传统并列。
特朗普的核心讯息是在承认双方存在差异的同时，强调两国之间的紧密联系。他表示，两国领导人都明白自己代表不同的制度，但两国人民之间的联系依然存在，而且两人“从未相处得这么好”。他补充说，双方可以共同继续建立一种促进下一代繁荣与安全的关系，并举杯祝愿两国拥有一个“和谐、和平与成功”的未来。
作为回应，习近平强调，两国的核心目标——特朗普的“让美国再次伟大”，以及中国所追求的“民族复兴”， 不必是零和博弈。他指出，这些目标“完全可以相互促进”，并呼吁探索一种以尊重、公平与互惠为基础的新型大国关系模式。
习近平明确警告，不应陷入“修昔底德陷阱”——即既有大国与崛起中的大国逐渐走向战争。他强调，美中竞争“应该是一种健康的竞争”，并表示北京与华盛顿“必须守住底线”，确保“我们之间没有冲突、没有对抗”。
谈及具有重大全球影响的科技风险时，习近平敦促两国共同承担“发展及管理人工智能向善的能力与责任，并强调就相关风险展开对话，确保先进科技始终受到人类控制。
商界领袖反应
从现场反应来看，商界领袖对当晚活动反应热烈。虽然目前没有他们实际回应的报导，但可以推测，这些大批出席的商界领袖，对两场演讲所展现的乐观与和解语调表示欢迎，并将两国领导人的祝酒与合作言论，视为一种地缘政治讯号，即两国有意保护全球供应链与跨境投资，同时努力以和平方式解决贸易、人工智能及其他尚未解决的结构性冲突。
西方“战狼式新闻”反应
《纽约时报》、BBC以及其他西方新闻机构，预料之中地对这场活动乃至整趟访问提出了另一种解读。这些媒体往往执著于对抗、犬儒或反对结盟的叙事，尤其将矛头指向中国。
对这些媒体而言，这场活动提供了另一个机会，可以抨击习近平主席及其政府，同时表达他们对特朗普对华政策的不满。
众所周知，新闻生态往往优先突出冲突、竞争与危机，而不是渐进式的稳定。而美国新闻机构所处的国内政治环境中，若被视为“对中国软弱”会付出沉重的政治与金钱代价。因此，对于中国的相关报导一贯倾向强调怀疑、谴责、风险、安全警告以及最坏情境。
然而，当对这场重要活动乃至整趟访问的新闻报导，完全透过威胁、徒劳与先入为主的谴责视角来框定这场外交接触时，就会压缩美国政策制定者寻求务实妥协的政治空间。媒体把任何让步或友善姿态描绘成战略损失，这种“战狼式”压力可能将领导人困在不断升级的立场之中，从而增加意外冲突的风险。
过去，无论美国针对越南、阿富汗、伊拉克乃至如今伊朗的冲突与战争中，“战狼式新闻”如何以平衡或细腻的姿态呈现，最终都为美国带来灾难性的结果。西方媒体如今对与中国冲突的过度聚焦，同样会掩盖真正的外交进展，削弱公众对和平建设的信任，并让美国人为另一场永无止境的战争付出更高代价。
对民众的影响
从正面来看，对公众而言，国宴与访问期间所展现的和谐，在两个重要方面令人感到安心。首先，两位领导人已向市场发出讯号，表明灾难性的经济脱钩或立即爆发的冲突正受到积极管控，而两个相互竞争的人工智能超级大国之间，也正在建立最低限度的外交沟通，以避免灾难性的后果。其次，公开展现的热情与尊重，正在为较低层级的官员与官僚设定方向，使他们能够在不必担心立即遭受政治反弹的情况下，就具体的贸易、科技与安全协议展开谈判。
重要的是，这条开创性的国政外交之路，应在现任美国政府任期结束后继续延续。
林德宜《习近平主席访美：未被报导的正面讯息》原文：President Xi Jinping US Visit: The Unreported Positives
The highlight of President Xi Jinping's visit to the United States was the state dinner in his honour. What stood out on that occasion was not only the star studded galaxy of private sector and business titans in attendance but also the fact that they, and an audience around the world, were treated to much more than the usual diplomatic rhetoric that accompanies such events.
Top American technology and financial executives attending included Nvidia's Jensen Huang, Tesla's Elon Musk, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Apple's Tim Cook, JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon, Black Rock's Larry Fink, Citigroup's Jane Fraser, Goldman Sachs' David Solomon and Susquehanna International Group's (noted TikTok investor) Jeff Yass.
They listened to two unusual speeches that provide positive indicators for US-China bilateral relations as well as the emerging new world order.
Reaffirming A Consequential and Stable Relationship
President Trump in his welcome praised the United States' relationship with China, remarking that he and President Xi Jinping had "never gotten along better". The speech also struck a notably warm tone about US-China relations. He framed the two nations through their deep heritages, citing China's thousands of years of tradition from Sun Tzu to Sun Yat-sen alongside America's inheritance from Jerusalem, Rome, Athens, Sparta, and the freedom declared in Philadelphia 250 years ago.
His central message acknowledged differences while emphasizing closeness. He said the two leaders understand they represent different systems, but the ties between their peoples endure and they've "never gotten along better." He added that together they can keep building a relationship that promotes prosperity and security for future generations, and toasted a future of "harmony, peace and success" for both nations
In response, Xi highlighted that the core ambitions of both nations—Trump's pledge to "Make America Great Again" and China's vision for "national rejuvenation"—do not have to be zero-sum. He noted that these objectives "can surely be mutually reinforcing" and called for exploring a new model of major-power relations based on respect, fairness, and reciprocity.
Xi explicitly warned against falling into the "Thucydides trap" - where an established power and a rising power drift into war. He emphasized that the U.S.–China competition "should be a healthy one" and stated that both Beijing and Washington "must hold the line" to ensure there is "no conflict and no confrontation between us".
Touching on technology risks with major global implications, Xi urged that both major powers carry the responsibility to "develop and manage AI for good," emphasizing dialogue on risks and ensuring advanced technologies remain under human control.
Business Leaders' Response
Images show the business leaders reacting with enthusiasm to the evening. There are no reports of actual responses. But it can be assumed that the business leaders who turned out in force welcomed the optimistic and conciliatory tone of the speeches and viewed the leaders' toast and collaborative rhetoric as geopolitical signalling of the two countries' intention to protect global supply chains and cross-border investments, whilst working towards peaceful resolution of unresolved structural conflicts over trade, AI and other issues.
Western Wolf Warrior Journalism Response
A different take on the event and the entire visit has predictably emerged from the New York Times, the BBC, and other Western news institutions fixated on adversarial, cynical, or anti-alignment narratives, especially targeting China
For them, the occasion has provided a further opportunity to vilify President Xi and his government as well as to express their disapproval of Trump's policies towards China.
It is well known that news ecosystems prioritize conflict, rivalry, and crisis over incremental stability. U.S. institutions operate within a domestic political climate where being perceived as "soft on China" carries heavy domestic political and monetary costs. Hence coverage consistently tilts toward highlighting skepticism, condemnation, risks, security warnings, and worst case scenarios.
However, when news reports of this important event and also the entire visit frames diplomatic engagement solely through the lens of threat, futility and preconceived condemnation, it narrows the political space for U.S. policymakers to seek pragmatic compromises. By portraying any concession or friendly posture as a strategic loss, media wolf warrior pressure can trap leaders into escalating stances that increase the risk of unintended conflict.
In the past, wolf warrior journalism, however balanced or nuanced it was presented, on American conflicts and wars against Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and now Iran ended with disastrous outcomes for the U.S. Western media's hyper-focus on conflict with China will similarly obscure genuine diplomatic progress, undermine public trust in peace-building, and make Americans pay a higher price for another never ending war..
Visit Public Impact
On the positive side, for the public, the display of harmony during the dinner and visit is reassuring on two important counts. Firstly the two leaders have signalled to markets that catastrophic economic decoupling or immediate conflict is being actively managed, and a baseline of decorum is being worked out between the two competing AI superpowers to avoid catastrophic outcomes. Secondly, the public declaration of warmth and respect is setting a directional tone for lower-level officials and bureaucrats to negotiate specific trade, technology, and security agreements without fear of immediate political blowback.
It is important that this path breaking statescraft is continued beyond this current U.S. administration.
本文观点，不代表《东方日报》立场。
要看最快最熱資訊，請來Follow我們 《東方日報》WhatsApp Channel.
